Minutes ago, I filed a formal complaint on behalf of citizens of Wisconsin with the FCC concerning Milwaukee's WTMJ and WISN radio.
Both stations are violating the FCC's Quasi-Equal Opportunities Doctrine (Zapple Doctrine) which provides that if a radio station gives free airtime to supporters of one major political party candidate, it must provide comparable time to supporters of the other major political party candidate.
Supporters of Tom Barrett are demanding their rights in the remaining days of the Scott Walker recall election, and we have asked the FCC to intervene immediately.
Read the full complaint here:
Media Action Center
Putting the Public Back into Broadcasters' "Public Interest Obligations"
Pages
- 2011 Wisconsin Media Reform Tour
- Broadcast Stations Public Interest Survey
- Home
- Our Public Airwaves
- SueWilsonReports.com
- Occupy Clear Channel Action Dec 12
- Letter to Clear Channel
- Petition to Deny WJNO-AM, Home to Rush Limbaugh
- About Us
- Follow us on Facebook!
- Formal Complaint to FCC re WISN and WTMJ
Press Conference of Scott Walker Recall Talk Radio Monitoring Report
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8BebETJJlcU&feature=youtu.be
courtesy Bruce Fealk, The Rochester Citizen
Note: I've been trying to embed this, can't make it work, so please click!
courtesy Bruce Fealk, The Rochester Citizen
Note: I've been trying to embed this, can't make it work, so please click!
Scott Walker Recall Talk Radio Monitoring Project
May 22, 2012
Starting May 9th, the first day of what has become known as
the Scott Walker recall campaign, members of the Media Action Center Wisconsin monitored
the five "Conservative" Talk Radio programs aired in prime dayparts
in the Milwaukee
radio market. The shows include those
hosted by Mark Belling, Vicki McKenna, and Jay Weber on WISN, the 50,000 watt
radio station licensed to Clear Channel,
and Charlie Sykes and Jeff Wagner on WTMJ, the 50,000 watt radio station
licensed to Journal Communications.
Both stations are called "News Talk" by their corporate
owners. Both reach far beyond the city
of their license, into most of the state of Wisconsin and beyond.
The purpose of
the project was to
1) Determine specifically how much time each licensee is
devoting to promoting each major political party during the campaign season.
2) Determine any notable imbalance in time offered to each
political party.
3) Determine whether the talk programs qualify as
"bonafide news" per FCC requirements for exemptions for comparable
time under Section 315(a) of the Communications Act or under the FCC's
"Quasi-Equal Opportunities" rule, known as the Zapple Doctrine.
4) Determine whether comparable time should be offered under
Section 315(a) of the Communications Act or under the FCC's "Quasi-Equal
Opportunities" rule, known as the Zapple Doctrine.
Methodology:
Five separate monitors recorded and timed statements made on
each of the five programs. They counted
how many minutes per show have been either clearly pro-Scott Walker and
Anti-Tom Barrett, how many minutes have been anti-Scott Walker and pro-Barrett,
and how many minutes have been pro-GOP and anti Democrat in general, and how
many were pro-Democrat and anti-GOP. They
also monitored statements made about the candidates for Lieutenant Governor and
the State Senate. These will be offered
in the final tally, but are statistically small; statements about the Governors race and
parties in general, however, are frequent, so this report will focus on those.
The monitors were instructed to count only those statements
which could be clearly identified as pro- or anti- one candidate or party.
Examples:
“Governor Walker is going to be on the show. Yay! My
governor is a Jedi.”
Tom Barrett is an idiot, Tom Barrett is a racist.
“when good people come forward to run for office the
Democrats put a hit squad out on them.” -McKenna. “Literally.” -Schimming.
Results:
1) Determine specifically how much time each licensee is
devoting to promoting each major political party during the campaign season.
Findings:
WISN
Pro Walker/ anti Barrett
5-9 1:49:28
5-10 42:54
5-11 1:00:08
5-14 49:46
5-15 48:30
5-16 1:00:26
5-17 53:07
sub 7:04:19
daily average 60 mins
Pro GOP/ Anti Dem
5-9 8:43
5-10 6:44
5-11 29:04
5-14 35:32
5-15 14:19
5-16 19:02
5-17 30:32
sub 2:23:56
daily average 20 mins
Pro-Barrett/Anti-Walker
5-9 4:58
5-10 0:00
5-11 0:00
5-14 0:00
5-15 0:00
5-16 :25
5-17 1:06
sub 6:29daily average: 55 seconds
Pro-Dem/anti GOP
0:00
WTMJ
ProWalker/Anti Barrett total:
5-9 51:30
5-10 58:58
5-11 51:54
5-14 34:34
5-15 40:49
5-16 50:43
5-17 52:25
subtotal 5:40:53
daily average 49 minutes
Pro GOP/ Anti Dem
total
5-9 0:00
5-10 1:38:14
5-11 46:15
5-14 31:20
5-15 31:18
5-16 30:57
5-17 38:01
sub 4:36:05
Daily average 39 minutes
Pro Barrett Anti/Walker total
0:00
Pro Dem / Anti GOP
total
5-9 0:00
5-10 5:29
5-11 0:00
5-14 0:00
5-15 3:81
5:16 :10
5-17 3:37
sub 13:37
Daily average 2 minutes
We continue to
compile numbers, and will post full results when they are completed, but based
on the first seven days of the recall campaign, we are finding that WISN
is airing an average of about 80 minutes, and WTMJ about 88 minutes, per day of
Pro-Walker/ anti-Barrett and pro-GOP anti-Democrat messages. On the pro- Barrett side, we have identified a
total of just six and one-half minutes of pro-Barrett messaging over the seven
days on WISN, and 13 and a half minutes of pro- Democratic messaging on WTMJ.
Considering that the programs monitored air
for more than 15 hours daily, this represents a small percentage of total
airtime.
However, should one wish to purchase that much time during a
campaign, the cost would be quite high. It
is difficult to precisely say how many dollars such airtime would cost, as
stations charge lower rates to candidates than they do to supporters of
candidates, and they charge different rates to various supporters. Stations also are reluctant to release what
they consider proprietary information. Based on inspections of the political
files our team conducted of public files at WISN and WTMJ, we can say that one
radio advertising spot costs roughly $100 to $200, depending on the length and the
time of airing.
So we have extrapolated these numbers out and found that
WISN is giving Walker and his GOP supporters between $16,000 - $32,000 in free
airtime every day, and WTMJ is giving them between $18,000 to $36,000 in free
time daily.
Between the two, we estimate that WISN and WTMJ hasgiven as much as $680,000 in free airtime to the GOP, Scott Walker, and his
supporters just in the first ten days of this election cycle.
Most of the time has been given to supporters of Candidate
Walker, although the candidate has appeared as a guest on six programs since
the race began May 9th.
--------------------------
2) Determine any notable imbalance in time offered to each
political party.
Based on the data noted above, WISN and WTMJ are clearly both giving GOP
candidates and supporters nearly exclusive time on their licensed stations.
In addition, the cadre of guests booked on the five programs shows
a clear imbalance.
The three programs aired on WISN, Belling, McKenna and
Weber, booked fourteen guests over first eight days of monitoring. Of the fourteen, only one, J.R. Ross, can be
considered independent analysts. The rest are either Republican candidates, GOP
political appointees, or Republican party appointees, campaign heads, or
current officeholders.
On WTMJ, seven
guests appeared on the two shows over the eight days. Of the seven, only one, Christian
Schneider, may be considered an
independent analyst. The rest are either
Republican candidates, GOP political appointees, or Republican party
appointees, campaign heads, or current officeholders.
Current candidates as guests within the first eight days of
the campaign:
WISN:
GOP Governor and candidate Scott Walker appeared on all
three of WISN's programs: once on
Belling, twice on McKenna, and once on Jay Weber. GOP Lt Gov. and candidate Rebecca Kleefish
appeared once on Belling and once on McKenna.
GOP Candidate Sen. Van Wangaard
appeared once on McKenna.
WTMJ:
GOP Governor Scott
Walker appeared three times on the Sykes show.
Section 315 (a) of the Communications Act provides for equal
opportunities for major party candidates should their opponent be given or sold
time. The opposing candidates have seven
days from the date of a broadcast to make such a request. This author is unaware whether Democratic
candidates Tom Barrett or Mahlon Mitchell made such requests or whether the
stations made opportunities available to Democratic candidates.
In addition, GOP Senatorial candidate Eric Hovde appeared
twice on WISN, once on the Belling program, once on the McKenna show. He also appeared once on WTMJ's Sykes
show. As Hovde's election will be held in November,
this appearance is outside the sixty day prior to elections rule, and his
opponent has no legal standing to demand equal time.
Supporters of Candidates guesting on programs:
WISN
GOP Rep Robin Voss appeared once on the Belling program, and
once on the Weber program. Brian
Schimming , Vice Chair WI GOP is a regular guest on the McKenna show, appearing
four times over eight days. GOP Rep.
Bill Kramer and GOP State Senator Glenn
Grothman each appeared once on McKenna.
GOP Milwaukee City Alderman Bob Donavan appeared once on the Weber program.
GOP State Senator Ron Johnson appeared once on the Weber program, and
GOP State Senator Alberta Darling appeared once on the Weber programs. Walker
political appointee Stephanie Klett appeared once on the McKenna show.
WTMJ
On WTMJ, GOP Rep.
Robin Vos appeared once on Sykes, as did
Walker
political appointee Cathy Stepp, and GOP Milwaukee City Alderman Bob
Donavan. GOP State Senator Alberta Darling appeared once on Wagner's show.
All these guests were clearly supporters of Scott Wallker
and/or the other GOP candidates. Under
the quasi-equal opportunities doctrine, in the 60 days prior to an election,
stations must provide comparable time for supporters of the opposing party if
they so request it within seven days of a given broadcast.
Supporters of Tom Barrett did make such requests; the stations have denied them comparable
time.
3) Determine whether the talk programs qualify as
"bonafide news" per FCC requirements for exemptions for comparable
time under Section 315(a) of the Communications Act or under the FCC's
"Quasi-Equal Opportunities" rule, known as the Zapple Doctrine.
Section 315 (a) of the Communications Act imposes Equal
Opportunities for candidates on broadcast stations. It says that (a) If
any licensee shall permit any person who is a legally qualified candidate for
any public office to use a broadcasting station, he shall afford equal
opportunities to all other such candidates for that office in the use of such
broadcasting station. If a program is
considered "bonafide news"
they are exempt from this rule.
This law was expanded in 1970 in Nicholas Zapple V FCC by a
vote of FCC Commissioners to require comparable time to supporters of major
party candidates. Commonly known as the
quasi-equal opportunities rule, this applies only to supporters of major party
candidates. If one side has received
free airtime, the FCC's Zapple Doctrine requires the other side also receive
free time.
Stations in Wisconsin are
fully aware of these requirements, as these FCC rules are provided to Wisconsin radio and TV stations by their own Wisconsin
Association of Broadcasters. See pages
five and six.
If, however, a radio program is considered "bonafide
news," it does not have to comply
with equal opportunities requirements.
According to the FCC, programs must meet three tests to be
considered "bonafide news."
The program must be regularly scheduled, producers must be in control of
guests and content, and the program must be non-partisan, not supporting any
candidates.
All five programs meet the requirements of being regularly
scheduled and having producers in control of guests and content. The question remained whether the programs
are non-partisan and not supporting candidates.
The monitoring showed that on this test, all five programs failed, some
more spectacularly than others.
As shown previously, the number and character or guests
invited on the five programs were heavily tilted toward the GOP side.
As to whether the shows were non-partisan and not being used
in support of any candidates, we have identified many examples of partisanship
on all five programs. Hosts routinely
identify themselves as supporters of Scott Walker, urge listeners to vote for Walker, and we have
documented that three of the shows, those on Clear Channel's WISN, which are actively
using the publicly owned radio airwaves to recruit volunteers for Walker and
the other GOP candidates.
Examples:
WISN:
Mark Belling:
|
|
Vicki McKenna:
McKenna tells listeners to volunteer for Sen. Wangaard
McKenna routinely refers to the Republican Party as “we,”
not “they”
McKenna openly advertises tickets for the state Republican
convention
Guest Schimming recruits volunteers for Walker
McKenna recruits volunteers for Walker, Sen. Wangaard, and
Lt. Gov. Kleefisch.
Jay Weber:
“I know I’m partisan”
Praised all four republican senate candidates – “they
would all be good”
“Scott Walker and we supporters of his”
Weber asks
listeners to volunteer for Walker
campaign, gives website to go to
“we need more
volunteers to make those contact calls”
WTMJ:
Charlie Sykes:
Said that he was going use his program for Conservatives
to give their side of the story.
"If Bob Bowman is going to call up an talk while we are
talking with Bob Donavan, we are not going to let him on. He had his shot.
Bob Donavan will be able to make his point uninterrupted by Major Tom
Barrett's lacky Aldermen Bob Bowman."
Jeff Wagner:
I have “genuine passion and support for the governor”
Because all five of the local Talk Radio programs on WISN
and WTMJ in Milwaukee
are showing poltical intent in their programming, they do not qualify as
"bonafide news" programs and are therefore subject to the Equal
Opportunities rules in the Zapple Doctrine.
News Distortion
|
The FCC also has clear rules against news distortion, so any
program which is distorting facts in any way cannot be considered
"bonafide news." Our
monitoring team has found numerous examples of news distortion in all five
programs. Some examples that are easily
debunked:
Belling: Obama's
stimulus "hasn't produced any gain in employment at all"
McKenna No Planned
Parenthood in Wisconsin
does cancer screenings.
Sykes: Walker got more
votes than Democrats combined
If a program willingly distorts facts, it must not be
considered a "bonafide news" program.
4) Should comparable time should be offered under Section
315(a) of the Communications Act or under the FCC's "Quasi-Equal
Opportunities" rule, known as the Zapple Doctrine?
Our findings show that WISN and WTMJ are both airing
programming which is extremely tilted toward only one major political
party. We find that all five local Talk
Radio programs studied are showing obvious political intent in what they are
airing on our public airwaves.
Therefore, the Quasi- equal opportunities rule (Zapple Doctrine) does
apply, and WISN and WTMJ must provide comparable time to supporters of Tom Barrett and the Democrats now through the end of
the election.
In order for the quasi-equal opportunities Doctrine to be triggered,
supporters of candidates must request comparable time from the station within
seven days of an imbalanced broadcast.
Several Tom Barrett supporters have complied with this
rule. WTMJ has written them back,
denying them time; WISN has not responded
to the dozens of requests sent to them.
The FCC is aware of this situation. A formal complaint will be made to the FCC to
rectify this situation immediately.
Wisconsin Supporters of Tom Barrett Demand Equal Time Tuesday!
Please join us Tuesday at 10 AM in front of WTMJ, 720 East Capitol Drive, Milwaukee, Wisconsin for our press conference where supporters of Tom Barrett will be demanding comparable time on WISN and WTMJ.
We will release the stunning results of our monitoring project, and will make an urgent request to the FCC to enforce existing laws requiring equal time for supporters of Barrett.
PLEASE BLOG, SHARE and please stand up for your rights Tuesday as the owners of the Radio Airwaves!
Talk Radio In Sacramento
April 30, 2012
Talk Radio In Sacramento
A Report On Our Meeting With
Clear Channel Sacramento
by
Sacramento Media Group (SMG)
and Media Action
Center (MAC)
March 2012
INTRODUCTION
On February 6, 2012,
representatives of Sacramento Media Group (SMG), Media Action Center (MAC) and Occupy
Sacramento, met with Clear Channel Sacramento (CCS) managers Jeff Holden and
Alan Eisenson. The meeting followed a December "Occupy Clear Channel"
action, which was held in response to CCS’s recent switchover of their KFBK- FM
92.5 to a “simulcast” (rebroadcast) of KFBK-AM
1530, the station that launched and airs Rush Limbaugh and other conservative
talk show hosts on a daily basis. With this change, Clear Channel now has three
“talk” stations in Sacramento,
all airing only programs with conservative political viewpoint in the key
Monday-through-Friday timeslots. No alternate points of view are offered.
What’s more, two of these stations transmit at very high power giving them a
range of hundreds of miles.
NOTE: We delayed publishing this report while we waited for CCS's promised response. Perhaps as no surprise, CCS declined to respond in writing.
Full report follows:
Boycott Local Sponsors of Rush Limbaugh
March 13, 2012
Want to boycott LOCAL sponsors of Rush Limbaugh, but you're not sure how to tell which they are? Find out at BoycottSponsors.com!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)